2022 is shaping up to be a critical year for the Biden Administration regarding U.S. international trade policy. In 2021, the Biden Administration made headway in resolving some of the challenges with United States’ allies that arose during the last Administration, and trying to build bridges in important regions that had perhaps had been neglected. But in a number of other critical areas, and arguably in the most significant areas, the Biden Administration made little tangible progress over the past year. The discussion below offers a look back at the key developments in 2021 with respect to U.S. trade relations with the EU, China, the rest of Asia and North America, and a look ahead at what could come in 2022.
Continue Reading The US International Trade Agenda: A Look Back, A Look Ahead
Section 201
U.S. Imports of Solar Products Face Increased Restrictions
The United States has imposed trade restrictions on imports of solar cells and panels starting in 2012, and since then, the number and nature of these restrictions has grown. The last several weeks have seen a potential for further increase and/or extension of these measures, further complicating trade in this critical component of alternative energy.
First, on September 2, 2021, a World Trade Organization (“WTO”) panel circulated its report in United States – Safeguard Measure on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products (DS562), upholding the Section 201 safeguard tariffs imposed by the United States on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells (“solar safeguard”). The solar safeguard is a 2.5GW tariff-rate quota that was imposed by the United States in 2018 on imports of solar cells from most countries. The tariff was initially set at 30 percent, and was scheduled to be reduced by five percentage points each year in the subsequent three years (lasting for a total of four years). China challenged the solar safeguard at the WTO, arguing that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) failed to comply with the 1994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”) and the Agreement on Safeguards when conducting its safeguard investigation. China argued that the ITC had failed to demonstrate that imports of products increased “as a result of unforeseen developments,” as required by the GATT, while also attacking the ITC’s analysis regarding the link between increased imports and serious injury. The WTO dispute settlement body has historically been skeptical of safeguard actions, often finding them inconsistent with members’ obligations. However, in this instance, the panel rejected all of China’s claims, and affirmed the reasoning of the ITC.…
Continue Reading U.S. Imports of Solar Products Face Increased Restrictions
US Trade Court Puts on Hold Presidential Action to Re-Impose 201 Tariffs on Bifacial Solar Panels
In a rare weekend action, the US Court of International Trade (CIT) issued on Saturday a temporary restraining order that prevented a recent presidential proclamation from re-imposing Section 201 tariffs on bifacial solar panels.
In 2018, President Trump imposed tariffs on imports of solar cells and modules pursuant to Section 201 of the Trade Act…